| Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Open Science Collaboration Science 349 (6251), aac4716, 2015 | 9659 | 2015 |
| Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience KS Button, JPA Ioannidis, C Mokrysz, BA Nosek, J Flint, ESJ Robinson, ... Nature reviews neuroscience 14 (5), 365-376, 2013 | 8486 | 2013 |
| A manifesto for reproducible science MR Munafň, BA Nosek, DVM Bishop, KS Button, CD Chambers, ... Nature human behaviour 1 (1), 1-9, 2017 | 3201* | 2017 |
| Redefine statistical significance DJ Benjamin, JO Berger, M Johannesson, BA Nosek, EJ Wagenmakers, ... Nature human behaviour 2 (1), 6-10, 2018 | 2851 | 2018 |
| Promoting an open research culture BA Nosek, G Alter, GC Banks, D Borsboom, SD Bowman, SJ Breckler, ... Science 348 (6242), 1422-1425, 2015 | 2741 | 2015 |
| The preregistration revolution BA Nosek, CR Ebersole, AC DeHaven, DT Mellor Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11), 2600-2606, 2018 | 1876 | 2018 |
| Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability BA Nosek, JR Spies, M Motyl Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6), 615-631, 2012 | 1659 | 2012 |
| Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 CF Camerer, A Dreber, F Holzmeister, TH Ho, J Huber, M Johannesson, ... Nature human behaviour 2 (9), 637-644, 2018 | 1633 | 2018 |
| Investigating variation in replicability RA Klein, KA Ratliff, M Vianello, RB Adams Jr, Š Bahník, MJ Bernstein, ... Social psychology, 2014 | 1360 | 2014 |
| Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology JB Asendorpf, M Conner, F De Fruyt, J De Houwer, JJA Denissen, ... European journal of personality 27 (2), 108-119, 2013 | 1081 | 2013 |
| Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings RA Klein, M Vianello, F Hasselman, BG Adams, RB Adams Jr, S Alper, ... Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4), 443-490, 2018 | 1077 | 2018 |
| The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? MJ Brandt, H IJzerman, A Dijksterhuis, FJ Farach, J Geller, ... Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50, 217-224, 2014 | 863 | 2014 |
| Registered reports BA Nosek, D Lakens Social Psychology, 2014 | 842 | 2014 |
| How open science helps researchers succeed EC McKiernan, PE Bourne, CT Brown, S Buck, A Kenall, J Lin, ... elife 5, e16800, 2016 | 804 | 2016 |
| Many analysts, one data set: Making transparent how variations in analytic choices affect results R Silberzahn, EL Uhlmann, DP Martin, P Anselmi, F Aust, E Awtrey, ... Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (3), 337-356, 2018 | 802 | 2018 |
| An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science Open Science Collaboration Perspectives on psychological science 7 (6), 657-660, 2012 | 760 | 2012 |
| Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency MC Kidwell, LB Lazarević, E Baranski, TE Hardwicke, S Piechowski, ... PLoS biology 14 (5), e1002456, 2016 | 700 | 2016 |
| Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” DT Gilbert, G King, S Pettigrew, TD Wilson Science 351 (6277), 1037-1037, 2016 | 694 | 2016 |
| Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication CR Ebersole, OE Atherton, AL Belanger, HM Skulborstad, JM Allen, ... Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 67, 68-82, 2016 | 574 | 2016 |
| Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science BA Nosek, TE Hardwicke, H Moshontz, A Allard, KS Corker, A Dreber, ... Annual review of psychology 73 (1), 719-748, 2022 | 571 | 2022 |
Brian NosekUniversity of Virginia; Center for Open ScienceVerified email at virginia.edu
