| On the revision of argumentation systems: Minimal change of arguments statuses S Coste-Marquis, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, P Marquis Fourteenth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge …, 2014 | 130 | 2014 |
| Extension enforcement in abstract argumentation as an optimization problem S Coste-Marquis, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, P Marquis Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015 | 82 | 2015 |
| Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics S Doutre, JG Mailly Argument & Computation 9 (3), 223-248, 2018 | 77 | 2018 |
| CoQuiAAS: A constraint-based quick abstract argumentation solver JM Lagniez, E Lonca, JG Mailly 2015 IEEE 27th International Conference on Tools with Artificial …, 2015 | 70 | 2015 |
| Control argumentation frameworks Y Dimopoulos, JG Mailly, P Moraitis Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 32 (1), 2018 | 55 | 2018 |
| Merging of abstract argumentation frameworks J Delobelle, A Haret, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, J Rossit, S Woltran Fifteenth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge …, 2016 | 53 | 2016 |
| A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks S Coste-Marquis, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, P Marquis European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 397-411, 2014 | 47 | 2014 |
| Argumentation-based negotiation with incomplete opponent profiles Y Dimopoulos, JG Mailly, P Moraitis 13èmes Journées d’Intelligence Artificielle Fondamentale (JIAF 2019), 91-100, 2019 | 39 | 2019 |
| Enforcement in formal argumentation R Baumann, S Doutre, JG Mailly, JP Wallner IfColog Journal of Logics and their Applications (FLAP) 8 (6), 1623-1678, 2021 | 23 | 2021 |
| United we stand: Accruals in strength-based argumentation J Rossit, JG Mailly, Y Dimopoulos, P Moraitis Argument & Computation 12 (1), 87-113, 2021 | 18 | 2021 |
| Introducing the fourth international competition on computational models of argumentation JM Lagniez, E Lonca, JG Mailly, J Rossit Third International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation, 2020 | 18 | 2020 |
| Using enthymemes to fill the gap between logical argumentation and revision of abstract argumentation frameworks JG Mailly arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.08789, 2016 | 15 | 2016 |
| Yes, no, maybe, I don’t know: Complexity and application of abstract argumentation with incomplete knowledge JG Mailly Argument & Computation 13 (3), 291-324, 2022 | 14 | 2022 |
| Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks JG Mailly Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty: 16th …, 2021 | 13 | 2021 |
| Possible controllability of control argumentation frameworks JG Mailly Computational Models of Argument, 283-294, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |
| Design and results of ICCMA 2021 JM Lagniez, E Lonca, JG Mailly, J Rossit arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08884, 2021 | 11 | 2021 |
| Dynamics of argumentation frameworks JG Mailly Université d'Artois, 2015 | 11 | 2015 |
| Quantifying the difference between argumentation semantics S Doutre, JG Mailly Computational Models of Argument, 255-262, 2016 | 10 | 2016 |
| Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks JG Mailly Logic and Argumentation: 4th International Conference, CLAR 2021, Hangzhou …, 2021 | 9 | 2021 |
| Stability in abstract argumentation JG Mailly, J Rossit arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12588, 2020 | 9 | 2020 |
Julien RossitVerified email at parisdescartes.fr
